The views presented on this site in no way reflects those of my employer, family, friends, acquaintances or distant cousins as these generally fall into three categories: the smart ones that agree with me, those that tolerate me because of my wit, charm, great intellect and modesty, and those who think that I'm a raving wingnut who's one Kennedy away from going medieval on the next vegan moonbat that barks.
I do not do links for the sake of reciprocity. I link only to those sites that I read and I only read RSS feeds. Feel free to send me a link to your site and I'll take a look. If I like it, and if you have a feed, I'll add you to my blogroll.
Copyright Statement
Any original material is the intellectual property of the author and is not to be used without permission, other than normal Internet journalistic practices of extracting portions of a post, acknowledging the author and providing link-backs to the source post.
I never thought I would read something even vaguely pro-Bush in NewSpeak Newsweek, but today there is an article that gives some grudging approval:
The other noted political scientist who has been vindicated in recent weeks is George W. Bush. Across New York, Los Angeles and Chicago—and probably Europe and Asia as well—people are nervously asking themselves a question: "Could he possibly have been right?" The short answer is yes. Whether or not Bush deserves credit for everything that is happening in the Middle East, he has been fundamentally right about some big things.
Amazing. Short-lived, no doubt. But still amazing.
Blog post #4656 in category
Defining Bush
posted 7 March 05
