Site Search


WWW
AlphaPatriot
Volitics


Take the Poll


Make Your Mark

AlphaPatriot Visitors Map
Stick your pin in the
AlphaPatiot Visitors Map

Counters

Day by Day

Day By Day© by Chris Muir.

About AlphaPatriot

In real life, AlphaPatriot is Darrell Carden.

The views presented on this site in no way reflects those of my employer, family, friends, acquaintances or distant cousins as these generally fall into three categories: the smart ones that agree with me, those that tolerate me because of my wit, charm, great intellect and modesty, and those who think that I'm a raving wingnut who's one Kennedy away from going medieval on the next vegan moonbat that barks.

Friends

Tennessee Firearms Association The Neolibertarian Network
The Club For Growth Coalition of Conservative Republicans
Shelby County GOP Friends of Israel

Archives

March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
More . . .

Link Policy

I do not do links for the sake of reciprocity. I link only to those sites that I read and I only read RSS feeds. Feel free to send me a link to your site and I'll take a look. If I like it, and if you have a feed, I'll add you to my blogroll.

Copyright Statement

Any original material is the intellectual property of the author and is not to be used without permission, other than normal Internet journalistic practices of extracting portions of a post, acknowledging the author and providing link-backs to the source post.

Powered By

AlphaPatriot.com is powered by Movable Type 3.3

Subscribe

RSS 1.0 Partial Post, No Formating
RSS 2.0 with Comments
WAP Feed

New Amendment Protecting Property Rights

If you are not outraged by the direction that the right of individuals to own property is taking in this country, then you are either a liberal or stunningly uninformed.

A PoliSci professor once told me that the original wording for the famous "unalienable rights" phrase was "life, liberty and property", but Rousseau's influence resulted in the change to "pursuit of happiness". So once again we were screwed by the French.

A freeper proposed this constitutional amendment for discussion:

RIGHT TO REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
  1. Whereas the power to tax is the power to destroy; Tax on all property, real and personal, except as income or on sale or transfer, above one-tenth of one percent per annum shall be prohibited.
  2. The taking of property by eminent domain shall only be by just compensation for the purpose of the erection of public infrastructure.
  3. Public property that is sold or otherwise converted to private use within 20 years shall first be offered to its original owner(s) or their heirs in substantially its original condition at its original price of acquisition.
  4. Property that is seized for non-payment of taxes must be speedily sold at auction. Any amount above the tax owed and costs must be returned to the owner.
  5. This article shall have no time limit on its ratification.
A damn fine idea. Personally, I would much rather have personal property protected by the constitution than the rights of same-sex couples limited by that document.

Blog post #5209 in category Politics
posted 23 June 05

 

Truly superior bloggers that reference New Amendment Protecting Property Rights:

» An amendment to protect private property.. from TriggerFinger:

I say go for it. [Read More]

Tracked on June 24, 2005 1:21 AM


While the proposed amendment is good what use is it when you have five senile Leftwingnuts who use the existing Constitution for toilet paper? Its time to hang some judges.

Posted by TJ Jackson on Thursday at 2:30 PM


Sir, I don't consider myself stunningly uninformed. I will admit that it is harder to keep up with U.S. issues as an expatriate in the Asia-Pacific area; however, I think you exaggerate when you call me "stunningly uninformed" because I'm not familiar with "the direction that the right of individuals to own property is taking" back home.

Are you stunningly uninformed of the global distribution of your readership? If not, then I'd suggest you've never tried keeping abreast of U.S. issues while living overseas. It's not easy; but I am trying.

Yours truly,
Rick Smothermon
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Posted by Rick Smothermon on Saturday at 3:02 PM


Nice. But the first part "Tax on all property, real and personal, except as income or on sale or transfer, above one-tenth of one percent per annum shall be prohibited." - what is that supposed to limit? Income, sales and transfer (eg inheritance) are just about all our taxes, I guess property taxes are above and beyond that, on homes?
Well, I would be in favor the amendment, though it should not be required and I would rather it stricter in limiting taxes.

Posted by liberty on Monday at 1:23 PM


That's not bad, but it should also include a statement to the effect:

The purpose of this ammendment is to protect private property and to grant to government a very limited power of eminent domain. If there is ever confusion about the meaning or intent of this amendment, benefit of the doubt shall be given to the protection of to private property.

We might as well say it openly so that future generations will be sure of its meaning.

Posted by phil on Monday at 4:10 PM


Phil, given the conflicting decisions handed down yesterday concerning the 10 Commandments on public property I'd say you are absolutely correct. Sometimes it seems that these guys make it up as they go along.

Posted by AlphaPatriot on Tuesday at 12:41 PM


Rick, thank you for reminding me what it is like to live overseas (it's been a while) and for chastising me for not keeping my readership in mind. I do tend to forget that I'm not writing this just for my family anymore.

Please stop by again and always feel free to post a comment.

Posted by AlphaPatriot on Tuesday at 12:47 PM

Post a comment