Great tits cope well with warming

The title of this post is stolen directly from BBC News. Honest. It's from the Science/Nature section and deals with global warming.

Then again, "tits" means something else entirely to the bird-watching population of England:

Of course, this is actually a very good lesson for the Gorebal Warming alarmists. As the natural temperature variations occur across geologic ages, different species are affected differently. What is bad for some is very good for others.

Permalink | Global Warming
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Black Liberation Theology

From Obama's Church Website:

The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology that started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone’s book, Black Power and Black Theology.

James Cone defines the theology as thus:

Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community ... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

When Wright was interviewed on Hannity and Combs in 2007 he repeatedly asked Sean Hannity, "How many of Cone's books have you read? How many of Cone's book have you read?"

Cones is a racist and a Marxist and Wright has wholeheartedly adopted his theology and has for the entire 20 years that Obama was in his church.

Entire post submitted by non-blogging Fourth Horseman. For more quotes from James Cone, read this post from Deus Decorus Est.

Permalink | Obama, Barack
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

NYTimes Wants McCain's Medical Records

The center of useful idiots thinks that John McCain should "provide detailed, timely disclosure about his health."

So far, he has failed to meet this obligation to voters, even though he is now the presumed Republican nominee.

The Times claims McCain should reveal this information for two reasons. First, in this era of modern medical science and extended life spans, McCain could be the oldest man ever to become president. Second, he once had skin cancer -- even though he beat cancer and today is cancer free, as evidenced by his lack of stops at hospitals for radiation treatments during the rigorous months on the campaign trail.

The Red Rag goes further, declaring:

No presidential candidate should get to the point that he has locked up his party’s nomination without public vetting of his health.

And where was the NY Times when half the voting population was demanding Kerry's medical records from the Vietnam war? Ah, perhaps the Times thinks that sick people can't lead while character is unimportant.

What am I thinking? Of course they don't believe character is important. Did they even read Obama's book? I'm talking about his first one, in which he reveals his true self.

Permalink | Media Spin
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)